S. Anand on Dalit Literature

In The Caravan, S. Anand provides an overview of modern Dalit literature, as well as insights into the portrayal of Dalits by many famous non-Dalit writers like Amitav Ghosh, Arundhati Roy, and Rohinton Mistry. While often sympathetic, he notes, these portrayals also tend to be unidimensional, where “Dalit characters lack distinct subjecthood prior to their involvement with high-caste characters.” Anand is co-founder of Navayana, “India’s first and only publishing house to exclusively focus on the issue of caste from anticaste perspective.”

SAnand

The journey of modern Dalit literature has been a difficult one. But even though it has not necessarily enjoyed the support of numbers (in what has come to be the trade publishing market) we must engage with what Dalits are writing—not simply for reasons of authenticity, or as a concession to identity politics, but simply because of the aesthetic value of this body of writing, and for the insights it offers into the human condition. In a society that is still largely unwilling to recognise Dalits as equal, rights-bearing human beings, in a society that is inherently indifferent to the everyday violence against Dalits and their near-total ghettoisation in various spheres of social and cultural activity, in a society unwilling to share social and cultural resources equitably with Dalits unless mandated by law (as seen in the anti-reservation discourse), Dalit literature has the potential to humanise non-Dalits and sensitise them to a world into which they have no insight. But before we can understand what Dalit literature is seeking to accomplish, we need first to come to terms with the stranglehold of non-Dalit representations of Dalits.

More here. The other founder of Navayana is Ravikumar, author of Venomous Touch, a collection of his writings translated from Tamil.


2 responses to “S. Anand on Dalit Literature”

  1. “Dalit characters lack distinct subjecthood prior to their involvement with high-caste characters.”
    Interesting point. At a book reading, I did ask Amitav Ghosh about his character Fokir in his book Hungry Tide. Fokir is a fisherman subsisting on the sunderbans waters. Why is it that we can never get behind how/what Fokir thinks/feels? Why does he not “speak”? Fokir was almost like Indian characters under Ruskin Bond/Kipling/Corbett. His answer was not convincing at all.
    Other than that Amitav Ghosh is one of my fav Indian writers.

  2. God Bless You Sir… Great Job

Leave a Reply to JagadishCancel reply

Contact us:

Go back

Your message has been sent

Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning.

Discover more from Shunya's Notes

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading