Ian Jack on Churchill

Namit Arora Avatar

Earlier this week the BBC invited the chairman of the fascist British National Party (BNP), Nick Griffin, now a member of parliament, to its Question Time debate. The move led to a huge controversy and public protests outside the BBC studio, and attracted 8 million TV viewers. Griffin observed rather memorably that if Churchill had been alive today, he would have been a member of the BNP. The mostly dismayed British press has jumped to the defense of their beloved leader, but Griffin’s observation is not entirely off the mark, as Ian Jack writes:

Ian_jack_140x140 However foolish Nick Griffin may have been on Question Time, one thing he said rang true: that if Winston Churchill were alive today, the British National party would be the only party that would have him. Churchill had notably racist opinions. About Indians, as the historian Ramachandra Guha has written, he could be “truly dreadful”. Leo Amery, his long-suffering secretary of state for India, recorded many Churchillian moments in his diary. One from September 1942 reads: “During my talk with Winston he burst out with, ‘I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion’.” The next year hundreds of thousands of people lay dead or dying from starvation in Bengal. When the cabinet was discussing the possibility that grain might be sent to relieve this appalling famine, Amery writes that the prime minister butted in with “a flourish on Indians breeding like rabbits and being paid a million a day by us for doing nothing about the war”.

In the end Amery wondered if his boss was ‘”really quite sane” about India. We could wonder the same about Griffin’s attitudes to Muslims. But when Jack Straw said on Question Time that the BNP’s policies contradicted “the longstanding values of British society”, we might also wonder just how long-standing some of those values have been.

More here.

Category:

Reader Comments


One response to “Ian Jack on Churchill”

  1. Namit,
    I am glad that Ian Jack pointed this out.
    This fact about Churchill is little known to most Americans who lionize him as the great defender of liberty and enemy of fascism. I suspect that the younger generation of British public also probably is not aware of how contradictory Churchill’s views were regarding keeping Europe safe from the Nazis but Asia and Africa firmly under the thumb (boots?) of Europeans. Eleanore Roosevelt was among the few Americans who saw through this hypocritical discordance in Churchill’s stance on human rights and civil liberties and called him out on it, much to the embarrassment of her husband FDR who liked the Prime Minister and was persuaded by him to join hands with the British during WWII.
    I am going to post the link to Jack’s article on my Facebook and perhaps even on A.B.

Leave a Reply

Contact us:

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Discover more from Shunya's Notes

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading