Revisiting Bhopal

Namit Arora Avatar

BhopalIn those apocalyptic moments no one knew what was happening. People simply started dying in the most hideous ways. Some vomited uncontrollably, went into convulsions and fell dead. Others choked to death, drowning in their own body fluids. Many died in the stampedes through narrow gullies where street lamps burned a dim brown through clouds of gas. The force of the human torrent wrenched children’s hands from their parents’ grasp. Families were whirled apart. The poison cloud was so dense and searing that people were reduced to near blindness. As they gasped for breath its effects grew ever more suffocating. The gases burned the tissues of their eyes and lungs and attacked their nervous systems. People lost control of their bodies. Urine and faeces ran down their legs. Women lost their unborn children as they ran, their wombs spontaneously opening in bloody abortion. [– From the “Bhopal Medical Appeal”, 1994]

Pinto “In the early hours of 2-3 December 1984, the Union Carbide factory in Bhopal accidentally spewed forth tonnes of toxic methyl-isocyanate (MIC) gas. In what has been described as the ‘Hiroshima of the chemical industry’, thousands died and hundreds of thousands were injured. The after-effects continue to date, with future generations bearing the burden of genetic malformations and contaminated groundwater. The paltry compensation, and denial of accountability by Dow Chemical (the corporation that now owns UCC), represents one of the greatest travesties of justice.”

Read Sathyu Sarangi’s account of the industrial catastrophe at it unfolded 25 years ago. An excerpt below:

The day after the gas leak, the train to Bhopal was nearly empty, and the few on it seemed to have no knowledge of what had really happened at their destination. Yet as soon as I walked out of the railway station, I could see thousands of people in utter pain – their eyes swollen, tears streaming down their cheeks, huddled together with family and friends. I saw some attempting to walk with unsteady steps, before falling down – whether unconscious or dead, I didn’t try to figure out. The railway station was just 1.5 kilometres from the Union Carbide plant, all of which was surrounded by densely populated communities that were badly affected by the leak.

The enormity of the pain all around, and my helplessness to offer any kind of assistance, was numbing. I just stood at the station exit and stared. My head and hands finally began to work again when I saw hundreds of people helping the victims. Young and old, mostly men, from various social and religious organisations and many more unaffiliated, were busy caring for the survivors. A bus stop just outside the railway station had become a medical relief camp, where survivors could get milk, fruit, water and words of comfort.

Medical supplies were limited to eye drops and antacids to deal with the burning sensation in the eyes and stomach, and tablets for breathlessness. Knowing that these were of little help, however, most of the volunteers in the area were focused on carrying survivors to passing vehicles, to be taken to the nearby Hamidia Hospital. I joined them for a while, and then decided to continue into one of the neighbourhoods near the station. There, I found the situation to be much worse. Open a door at random, and you were apt to see an entire family sprawled on the floor – some unconscious, some groaning, only a few able to talk. I went back to the main street and soon had more than 50 volunteers join me in carrying people from their homes, lifting them into passing vehicles. Not one of the drivers of these cars, trucks or autorickshaws refused to take the victims to the hospital; there was always room for another survivor.

The evening sky on my first day in Bhopal was lit up by the mass cremation pyres that I was told had been burning non-stop since the previous day. I met a man whose hands were covered with blisters. He lived next to a Muslim graveyard. Not knowing what else to do, he didn’t stop digging mass graves for three days and three nights, unmindful of what the work was doing to his unpractised hands. I must have been in a similar state of mind. It was only several days later that I began to make some sense amidst the chaos and uncertainty: Is the water safe to drink? Is the food okay to eat? Many mothers died, many aborted as they ran, but what of the unborn babies who had no place to escape to from the poison clouds, were they okay? And I found things to do amidst the millions that needed to be urgently done.

More here. Also check out some pictures of Bhopal, including the site of the disaster, from my 2005 visit. The video below includes footage taken during or soon after the incident.

Category:

Reader Comments


5 responses to “Revisiting Bhopal”

  1. Some thoughts:
    The compensation amount is quoted to be “very paltry” at $500… I believe however, that was about the standard compensation that would have been dispensed had a government company killed you around the same time. Indian lives are cheap, and not just to MNCs.
    Union Carbide owned 51% of UCIL…. I think GOI owned the rest…. shouldn’t it also add a compensation amount commensurate with its share?
    Effort should now focus on clean up. While the liability might be Dow’s, Everyready’s or somebody else’s, the people of Bhopal can’t wait any longer for clean water and clean soil. Somebody needs to do it; responsibility can be fixed later. If not we are guilty of by wallowing in the “victim status” while (or by) letting suffering continue. I believe the responsibility for cleanup should be delinked from culpability for the disaster, it is just standard decommissioning cost that any factory must bear (to the extent that I understand it, the contamination has little to do with the disaster itself; just the standard contamination you would have if you let chemical stockpiles lie around for 25 years).
    And now that the private sector (maybe even MNCs) will be allowed to set up nuclear power plants in India, the framing of liability laws related to the same needs to be carefully watched; or we will have failed to learn from Bhopal…..

  2. Kapil,
    I agree that the Indian and MP state government’s response to Bhopal has been pretty shameful. There is no excuse for not cleaning up the contamination, or for not providing more ongoing relief to the victims. It shouldn’t depend on whether Dow has paid for it (and sadly, given today’s economic imperatives, the Indian government will likely not pursue Dow to avoid creating the impression that it is anti-MNC).
    That said, I’m not sure the $500 compensation would have been “standard” in ’84, had an Indian company caused this. First, this is hard to establish, since no other industrial disaster in India comes close to Bhopal in its scale and impact. I might agree with you if we were talking about one-off accidental dismemberment claims from factory work at, say, TISCO or SAIL. But Bhopal caused disabilities that are far more debilitating psychologically (if not also physically), created ongoing medical needs among survivors as well as hideous birth defects in later generations. Then there are the lies and misinformation: Union Carbide Corp. apparently maintained for a whole decade that MIC gas has no long term health effects. What financial penalties does this deserve?
    Further, the compensation was paid long after ’84, and should have been calibrated accordingly — $500 in ’90s India bought much less than in ’84. As for the 49% Indian shareholding (by many investors), I hear what you are saying but corporate bylaws invest both the authority and the responsibility with the majority shareholder. While moral obligations may be more diffuse, the legal obligations I think are clear enough.
    And finally, Dow is an American company and while legally it may only be required to pay reasonable compensation in local Indian terms (which I believe it didn’t), we have to hold it to higher standards more fitting to global corporations. To only expect it to comply with local standards is to allow and encourage a de facto race to the bottom. Dow follows US standards in the US, and for the privilege of setting up factories in the third-world, it should be expected and required to raise the bar on local labor laws and practices, rather than only strive for the often abject standards of the third-world. Of course, easier said than done, but this can be part of the attitude we bring to this issue.

  3. Hi,
    The compensation amount was closer to $2200 but I agree that’s not the point. I do get worked up when people talk of Bhopal while choosing to overlook the hundreds of little Bhopals (both environmental disasters and unsafe labor practices by Indian companies) in the spirit of “9% growth”. I also agree that American companies must raise the local bar while operating in countries such as India.
    Culpability also needs to be fixed on the government. For example, the government took away the right of the victims to sue Union Carbide (invested the power in itself by passing a special act in parliament) and then failed the victims miserably. Not letting Union Carbide or Dow off the hook; but not enough is said about the government’s role. The Madhya Pradesh still has a minister whose only job is to look into gas relief and the union ministry of chemicals also devotes some bureaucrat to the issue. However inadequate the compensation, money is still left over from what UCC paid.
    Also, a journalist tells me that the bureaucrats dealing with the case for the government were under pressure to rush to a settlement. Bofors was around and the government did not want to be seen as letting corporates off the hook.

  4. Kapil, you raise really good points. There is a danger of Bhopal becoming merely a symbol for which global activists and celebrities come out to show how much they care, while all manner of little Bhopals continue to unfold without arousing much indignation or action.
    Btw, the final settlement with UCC was $470 M, one-tenth of what the Indian government had initially wanted. According to this report,

    By the end of October 2003, according to the Bhopal Gas Tragedy Relief and Rehabilitation Department, compensation had been awarded to 554,895 people for injuries received and 15,310 survivors of those killed. The average amount to families of the dead was $2,200.

    You’re right about the compensation for the dead. I was talking about the compensation to the injured survivors, including many severely disabled. Some quick math shows that the average was not much beyond $500. Wikipedia says $830.

  5. And now that the private sector (maybe even MNCs) will be allowed to set up nuclear power plants in India, the framing of liability laws related to the same needs to be carefully watched; or we will have failed to learn from Bhopal…..

    Kapil, here is a news story I spotted. In the next 20 years, India plans to setup about 50 nuclear power plants, each at the cost of $4-5 billion. The US is now negotiating a three-part business deal, one part being the enactment of a Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill in which “compensation, in the event of a major accident [has] a limit of approximately $450 million,” less than what even Union Carbide paid for a major accident in 1984. This is truly shocking! If you find some opposition to this in the Indian media, let me know.

Leave a Reply

Contact us:

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Discover more from Shunya's Notes

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading